Tuesday, December 31, 2013

A guide to using old manual focus lenses on modern digital cameras

As the first gear related post here on f/otography I thought I would cover a subject near and dear to my heart. That being the use of old legacy lenses from the film era on the latest batch of techno wonders we call digital cameras. With an arcane melding of old world magic and modern electronics you can use these lenses from a bygone era to create compelling and beautiful imagery. But how do you do it? Which lenses work on which cameras, and how? How does one take an ancient lens from a (usually) dead system and combine it Frankenstein-like with up to date kit? Read on for the ins and outs.

There are many reasons why people still use these old film relics in the brave new digital world. Mainly because they are still capable of taking amazing photographs. If you think about it, these lenses were responsible for the majority of the most incredible photographs of the Twentieth Century. But there is also the issue of cost. Many times old lenses are available for a fraction of what its modern, plastic auto focus version would cost. Although for some lenses, especially for very high quality glass of exceedingly rare or esoteric value, this is not the case. Many old lenses still sell for thousands and thousands of dollars.

Old M42 lenses on a NEX 7

Another compelling reason (and this is a big one for me) is the feeling you get when you use them. Of course its important to point out that a lens is nothing more then a tool used to capture the image you are after, and the image is everything. But I find that I enjoy using a heavy, all metal lens full with high quality glass and coatings to help me capture that image. Actually turning a metal aperture ring by hand instead of clicking some small plastic dial on a plasticky camera body is more of a Zen like experience. I feel that I can connect with my gear in this way which in turns helps bring me to that place where my mind is most focused on trying to capture light and bend it to my will. Photography is an artistic process, and anything that stimulates your mind and helps bring you to that creative plane should be exploited.

So without further ado here are some of the more basic technical issues you should think about if you are considering the use of old film era lenses. Future posts on this blog will cover more in depth looks at some of the old lens lines and their differences and availability.

Probably the most important aspect in understanding exactly which old lens can be used on which camera is  flange to focal distance. Sounds technical and possibly confusing but all it means is the original distance that a manufacturer of an old camera and lens system required for the rear of the lens to be placed away from the film plane. In other words, the distance from where the actual film was in the camera out to the mounting flange on the front of the camera where the lens would be connected. This distance will determine if a lens can easily be adapted to your camera, as long as someone makes an adapter for it that is.

Basically, if the original FtF distance on the lens you have is greater then the FtF distance of the camera you are trying to mount it to then theoretically it should work. I should point out here for clarification that individual lenses in a system generally will all have the same FtF distance. For example, all Canon FD lenses have the same FtF distance so you only need to buy one Canon FD adapter for your camera and all those lenses should work. You dont have to figure out the FtF for each lens. (Note: there are a few small exceptions to this rule. Some lens lines have a few specialty lenses that were designed to be used in mirror lock up mode on their old original bodies and these may not work with a basic adapter. But these lenses are few and far between and usually very expensive). 


Are old lenses worth it? Oh yeah.
Minolta MD 35/2.8

Here is a good link to the Wiki page for a FtF distance list for most camera systems.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flange_focal_distance

The easiest way to use this list is to first find your camera system and where it falls on the list. Then look at everything listed under your camera. Those are these systems that have a greater FtF distance so (again, theoretically) they should be able to be adapted to your camera.

Another thing the list will show you is one of the main differences in modern camera design. For a long time the DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) was the predominant type of camera used by professional photographers and advanced enthusiasts. This type of camera has a large mirror in front of the shutter to bounce light up to the view finder so the image can be seen by the shooter. Most Canon and Nikon cameras fall into this category. Recently however a paradigm shift has been occurring with the introduction of Mirrorless cameras. These cameras do away with the bulky mirror box assembly and use an electronic view finder instead of an optical one. This frees up a lot of space in front of the shutter/sensor area so the mounting flange for the lens can be moved much closer to the sensor.

Just look at the FtF distances on that list for some of the major camera system. You will see that the Canon EOS EF mount system has a FtF distance of 44mm. That places it pretty far down the list, with only a few major systems listed below it that can be adapted. Conversely the Sony E mount system (used on NEX and the new A7 cameras) is very close to the top with a FtF distance of only 18mm. With such a short FtF distance the Sony system is able to adapt many more lenses to their bodies then the Canon system can.

Helios on my EOS. M42 Russian goodness.

So what type of camera you have will in large part determine the availability of legacy glass that will be easily adaptable to your camera. For instance, Nikon is way down on the bottom with little or no options to shoot for legacy glass other then Nikons own legacy manual lenses in the F mount. (Note: There is a way to use lenses listed above your camera on this list, but it involves the use of an extra piece of 'correction glass' in the adapter and I do not recommend doing this. If you want to go thru all the trouble of using these quality old lenses then dont put some cheap, coke bottle glass in your adapter that will degrade image quality.)

Another major difference in using either a DSLR or Mirrorless camera is the aforementioned view finder. When using the optical view finder (OVF) on a DSLR there is no compensation to the image you see when you stop down the aperture on your old lens. So the OVF just gets darker and darker until its really to dark to focus properly or even compose. Many people get around this by focusing while the lens is wide open and then stopping down to take the picture. A bit of a bulky and cumbersome work around but it does work.

With a Mirrorless camera and an electronic view finder (EVF) you basically are just looking into a tiny TV screen when you use the view finder. The advantages of this is that as you stop the lens down and less light is entering the lens the EVF doesn not get darker. The camera will compensate for the loss of light and make the image brighter while still remaining true to what the final image will look like. This is a huge boon to legacy shooters. Many Mirrorless cameras also have some form of Focus Peaking which simply has to be used to be appreciated. What focus peaking does is highlight in a chosen color what area of the image is in focus as you rack the lens back and forth. This is an incredible advantage to users of legacy lenses and makes old lenses almost as fast to use as auto focus lenses in just about any situation except for fast action or sports.

Zeiss Biotar 58/2, M42 mount
on NEX 7

After you figure out which lenses you can use on whichever camera you have you are pretty much ready to start looking for these little gems and can begin cranking out great photos. One of the joys of using old lenses is that you can find them in all kinds of places. Thrift stores, garage sales, flea markets...you just never know what is going to turn up. Sometimes the hunt for these lenses becomes fun in and of itself. There are of course the 'usual' places to find them, like the auction site and the place that Craig runs. But many of the lenses found here will carry a higher premium since those sellers are generally more knowledgeable then most thrift store pricing schemes (although I have noticed this changing as well, thrift stores are starting to wise up). The simple fact is that more and more people are discovering or re-discovering the ability of these old lenses and that they are fully capable of taking photos just as good as today's plasticky zooms. 

Using manual focus lenses can be a wonderful photographic journey that can lead you to view your photography in new and different ways while stimulating your creativity. If you are contemplating giving it a try I say go for it. Dont be afraid to give up Auto Focus, dont be afraid to try something different. The more I shoot the more I realize photography is very much like life in that it is a never ending journey of discovery. There is always another technique or tool to use and the learning never ends. Old film glass can be a powerful tool in your arsenal of image creation. Give em a chance.

Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50/1.7

Thursday, December 26, 2013

The Alchemist Photographer

Forget APS-C. Forget full frame. Forget medium format. How about a wet plate camera the size of a truck. Literally, its in the back of a truck. No other camera like this exists.

Ian Ruhter has taken the creation of the photographic image to a whole new level. Doing what most of us only long for he is living his dream and creating stunning photographic imagery at the same time. He has gone back to photography's roots, when toxic chemical brews and a bit of magic bent light to its will. Truly he is an alchemist photographer.

Watch this incredibly inspiring video and look on in awe at this mans determination and skill. Every time I watch it I want to go shoot. To inspire others simply by your actions is the most noble of things. Thank you Ian.


Tuesday, December 24, 2013

New Camera News- puts the fun in funtography

Just stumbled across this little internet gem.

http://newcameranews.com/

A decidedly light hearted approach to the gear driven world of photography that we find on the internets today. If you are not a photog you probably wont get a lot of the humor. If you are a photog you will be laughing your ass off. :)


Sunday, December 22, 2013

Dear Shane

I found this poignant short film some time ago. A bittersweet tribute to longing and loss, of loved ones now gone. It is a reminder of how photography can be a powerful tool of remembrance, a time machine. It also asks us to remember the truly important things in life...

    "Its not the houses you've lived in, the buildings you've
worked at, or the things you own. Heirlooms wind 
up in yard sales. In the end it's the people you love,
your friends, your family. Those matter, you matter."


To often we get caught up in the day to day minutia. Our work, our hobbies, our troubles. It is the eternal curse (and gift) of man that we forget our mortality. We forget the temporary nature of our existence and that all too soon the veil will part for us as well.



Saturday, December 21, 2013

The Solitude of Ravens

Only yesterday did I discover the works of Masahisa Fukase. His life story is a tragic tale but his photography strikes a deep chord with me. A work from his later life entitled The Solitude of Ravens is a powerful and gripping collection of visual imagery. Unfortunately a copy of the book is not currently within my budget but it has just rocketed to the top of my "must have" list of photographic literature. I can only google the images out of the webspace and stare in awe at what appears on my monitor.

This is photography, raw and powerful. This is a soul laid bare through the capturing of an ancient totem animal.




images from Ravens


That I cannot capture like imagery is a failing of my art.

A brief history of his life leading up to Ravens and beyond can be found here. I highly recommend giving it a read. http://www.utata.org/sundaysalon/masahisa-fukase/

Oddly enough, only a couple of days before discovering his work I captured the photo below driving home as dusk fell. It is my search for imagery such as this that makes me admire how simply and dynamically Masahisa was able to create the photos he did. While my photo is pleasing to me I am almost shamed to mention it in the same breath as the work of a master. Even more so that the birds in my photo are pigeons, not ravens. :)  Ironically they were circling the parking lot of a One Hour Photo and from time to time landing to rest on the roof.

not to be confused with the masters works...

In the beginning...

Photography. The art of capturing light onto a chemical or physical or electronic medium to in some way preserve a small sliver of time in the form of a two dimensional image. A hobby for many, a profession for some and a mystery to most.

For myself photography has turned out to be the singular medium in which I have been able to express myself artistically. I cannot paint or draw. I sing horribly and the skill for musical instruments eludes me. My poetry is best left unread and forgotten. But the art (and it is most definitely an art) of taking up camera and lens to create a pleasing image is something that I believe I have had some modest success with. At least for my own enjoyment as my images are pleasing to me.

I viewed a short but wonderful online video recently (which I unfortunately cannot now find) in which a photographer was expounding upon the nature of our craft and one thing he said stuck out for me. It was something to the effect of we dont take the picture for ourselves, we take the photographs for 'them', out there. 'Them' in this case being the great unwashed multitudes of potential viewers of our image. The non-photographers, everyone else. I'm not sure I agree with this. Maybe it is a loftier ambition and a great act of selflessness to endeavor to create solely for the enjoyment of others. I fear I am not so noble. As for now I shoot for that rare zen like feeling I sometimes reach when holding my small camera and turning the old lens until all the disparate parts of light and composition and technology come together to give me the potential image, if only I have the skill to capture it. It is a selfish act my art. The image has always been for me. And recently for my young daughter, who I hope will enjoy these images her father has captured in the years to come as she grows older. If any of 'them' like my photo as well then that is an extra thing, unlooked for.

For matters such as this, and so many others I wish to explore pertaining to photography, I have decided to start this blog. For a long time I have posted to many different forums and online resources. I have answered many other peoples questions concerning technique and gear and generally tried to share my experience with my time with photography. So maybe my photography is not as selfish as I wold believe. But I desire now to share my experiences in a more personal way. A more philosophical way. I hope this blog will be the channel for that.

The focus here will be all things photographic. From techniques to past masters to gear...anything will be fair game. I will share insightful links that I find as I crawl about the webspace looking for interesting tidbits and I may post things that are on my mind that day. I hope any future readers here will find my contributions both interesting and varied.

Welcome to f/otography. I am the f/otographer and I hope you enjoy the time spent here.





I WANT YOU....to take more photographs! :)